Pages

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Cycles forecast: The 139 TD Cycle has us down into 11/9L +/-1

From this past 11/3 weekend Email: "  The next 10 TD Hurst Cycle is due on 11/9 Low+/-2. There is a regular 139 TD Cycle due on 11/9 Low as well. Various Cycles, including the 45 Yr Cycles suggest we should see a drop into 11/7-8L+/-. There are very high odds Monday 11/5 closes up for the day"

From 11/5 daily Email:  "Cycle Summary: 11/5-6H, down to 11/8L.
Time CIT:  There is a 11/6 MeR, 11/7 Solar and 11/08 geometric CIT supporting a 11/7-8 Low. 
11/8-9 Fibonacci cluster: 9/14H+55CD =11/8, 8/21H +55TD=11/9, 7/3H+89 TD =11/9, 2/5/10L+144wks=11/9"

Actual: We saw a 11/6 High at the Mercury Retrograde and are seeing a sharp decline today 11/7.


The 139 TD cycle has been very reliable in the past and is also pointing down into 11/9 Low +/-1. 

A closer look at the 139 TD Cycle confirm that the Lows are at most +/-1 TD (not +/-3).

2/5/10L + 140 = 8/27/10L +139 = 3/16/11L + 140 = 10/4/11L + 138 = 4/23/12L + 139 = 11/9L+/- 1 TD

22 comments:

  1. Yes market guy, that is what the 139 TD Cycle, it is a long cycle.

    Ofcourse, I have other Time and Cycles for subs that pinpoints the exact day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. what happened to 10/26 being the low?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It got taken out. That is only one cycle I am looking at. markets are not that simple. I told subs we could still see lower lows in the coming days.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So are you expecting this coming low to hold, or will it be a short term/temporary low?

    ReplyDelete
  5. that's what I don't understand...if you follow enough cycles eventually some will hit but if not, you move onto a different one(?)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Margetguy,

    That is simply an incorrect understanding.

    10/26 was a Low, which was correct and now the 139 TD Cycle +/- 1 TD will also be a Low.

    Upon a closer look at the 139 TD Cycle I noticed that the Lows are at most +/-1 TD, not 3.

    2/5/10L + 140 = 8/27/10L +139 = 3/16/11L + 140 = 10/4/11L + 138 = 4/23/12L + 139 = 11/9L+/- 1 TD

    ReplyDelete
  7. Raj,

    Great work on nailing the last few highs and low. Coupled with the 200 day moving average as support for the S&P, do you see this as more of an intermediate low that may hold for more than a few weeks?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Raj,

    Great work on nailing the last few highs and lows. Coupled with the 200 day moving average as support for the S&P, do you see this as more of an intermediate low that may hold for more than a few days, and more like a few weeks or more?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Raj.

    Did you count the 2 trading days the market had to skip due to the storm?

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Big Bang, yes 139 TD is on 11/9+/-1.

    Yes Fred, it should be an intermediate Low. I am looking for a multi week rally

    ReplyDelete
  11. FYI and FWIW, 139 TD cycle has failed to produce a Low and we are looking for lower lows

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ha. I think we all got that much already...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Today is merely 3 TD past the predicted 11/9L at 1373.03 SPX. Current prices are at 1367 SPX, only -6 SP's lower, but still that for me is a cycle failure in my work and indicates we have NOT bottomed yet.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Does the eclipse hold any significance in your work?

    ReplyDelete
  15. BBI, the SE was a minor swing High, not all eclipses have CIT power though

    ReplyDelete
  16. when is the "real" low? since the 139 cycle failed

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Steve, I am expecting within 1-2 weeks of the 139 TD projected Low.

    I know others don't see that as a failure, bt as I am a perfectionist, the 139 doesn't work for me as a perfect timing tool.

    You have to use these fixed cycles in confluence with other Timing and cycle techniques.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Raj:

    The Puetz crash window opens on 11/22 - 6 days before a lunar eclipse preceded by a solar eclipse. Does your cycle work project such crash possibilites?

    ReplyDelete
  19. man, are you guys still looking for a low (been over a week and much pain now)?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi IAN,
    I will have to look into this 139 TD cycle. I love the 144TD cycle +/- 3td but you may have find tuned that cycle.
    Best to you.
    Jerry O

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks JerryO, The 139 Cycle was 5 TD late as it arrived at the 11/16 Low.

    Regards,

    Ian

    ReplyDelete